Section
6
Implementation
|
Section 6.1 Development Toolbox |
|
|
|
|
|
The residents of Fairhope have a number of
implementation tools available, including: zoning regulations, subdivision
regulations, infrastructure provision (water, sewer, streets), and capital improvements
programming. |
|
|
|
|
|
Zoning Regulations |
The City’s zoning ordinance (establishing use
districts and regulating placement, spacing and size of land and buildings)
is one of the most flexible, and therefore most important, tools of land
development regulation and guidance.
The zoning ordinance is a set of instructions for land development and
it should include a mix of policy and site-specific layout direction. |
|
|
|
|
Subdivision Regulations |
Subdivision regulations address the layout and
placement of a new or enlarged development within a specific zone. Subdivision regulations are typically
applicable to residential development, but are increasingly made applicable
to non-residential development as well, in the form of office and industrial
parks. Subdivision regulations are an
appropriate tool for analyzing the design of new development and its impact
on existing public facilities and services. |
|
|
|
|
Capital Improvements
Program |
The long-range capital improvements program
(“CIP”) is a five- (5) year plan that prioritizes and directs resource
allocation for appropriate projects including streets, sewers, and
parks. The CIP includes a financing
plan for multi-year projects and a schedule for high priority projects. A key component of the CIP is a one-year
adopted capital improvements budget. A CIP is an important implementation tool to
ensure that Fairhope has planned the most cost-effective facilities and to
determine whether the government will have the capability to fund needed
public facilities and services. The
long-range CIP should reflect the size, approximate location and estimated
costs of improvements needed to serve anticipated growth for the next fifteen
to twenty years. This plan is not a
detailed engineering document, but it should provide enough specificity to
determine which costs are required to remedy existing deficiencies and which
costs provide new capacity that will be demanded by new development. |
|
|
|
|
|
Some of the recommendations that should be
included in Fairhope’s Capital Improvement Plan are: ·
Acquire additional park land in identified
growth areas ·
Extend water and sewer services into particular
geographic locations ·
Assess sidewalk conditions and design /
implement a phased program to make improvements ·
Begin a comprehensive street overlay program to
prioritize and proactively upgrade existing street conditions |
|
|
|
|
Growth Coordination/
Phasing |
To coordinate the timing, intensity and density of
growth with the availability of public facilities and services, the City
should prepare an overall growth coordination framework that identifies a
timing pattern for growth. The
framework should include criteria for rezoning and subdivision approvals to
be used by decision-makers when making determinations in outlying areas or
the extra-territorial jurisdiction. |
|
|
|
|
Impact Review |
Review of proposed developments at a subdivision
or rezoning level should include an analysis of on-site/site design impacts
and off-site impacts such as traffic generation, road maintenance, emergency
services, and open space/park/trail provision. For projects of a pre-determined size or in specified
locations, review could also include environmental, conservation and fiscal
impacts. |
|
|
|
|
Community Aesthetics |
A unifying design concept can be an important
element in reflecting a community’s character through its built
environment. Design at a
community-wide scale can be incorporated into site design of commercial
centers, new subdivision lot site criteria, and industrial sites. |
|
|
|
|
Landscaping and Buffering |
Landscaping and buffering serve a critical
function of screening more intense uses from less intense uses as well as
adding beauty and interest to individual building sites. With a plan that blends commercial and
retail uses as well as density changes across the City, it is necessary to
ensure that different categories of use are buffered from each other. It is equally important to ensure that
landscaping is integrated into all site development to reflect Fairhope’s
character and provide for a blending of uses in the existing landscape. |
|
Section 6.2 Strategies Matrix |
||||
|
|
||||
|
The following strategies are intended to guide the
City’s implementation of the Fairhope Comprehensive Plan. They are organized into five categories:
Physical Image; Community Identity; Growth; Infrastructure; and
Coordination. Specific strategies are
provided for each category within a phasing plan. There are three suggested phases: Short Term (0-2 years),
Medium Term (2-5 years) and Long Term (5+ years). |
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Short Term 0-2 yrs |
Medium Term 2-5 yrs |
Long Term 5+ yrs |
|
Physical Image |
Study parking and traffic patterns; implement
necessary improvements |
v |
|
|
|
|
Consider creation of overlay districts in zoning
ordinance to reinforce special characteristics of identifiable areas of City |
v |
|
|
|
|
Encourage location of public buildings Downtown |
v |
|
|
|
|
Prepare urban design guidelines |
|
v |
|
|
|
Prepare a streetscape and landscape plan |
|
v |
|
|
|
Consider creation of business improvement district
for Downtown to provide parking and maintenance |
v |
|
|
|
|
Evaluate current signage system to determine
legibility and effectiveness for guiding tourists |
|
v |
|
|
|
Identify, evaluate and build necessary gateways at
major entrances to the City and neighborhoods |
|
v |
|
|
|
Continue program to improve, enhance and preserve
aesthetic qualities in the public rights-of-way (lighting, sidewalks,
streets, landscaping) |
v |
|
|
|
|
Continue to include in the Capital Improvements
Program the change from above ground to below ground utilities |
v |
|
|
|
|
Prepare an ordinance for the City of Fairhope that
creates the mechanisms and procedures for the establishment of historic
districts |
v |
|
|
|
|
Complete the historic resources survey for the
City of Fairhope |
v |
|
|
|
Community Identity |
|
Short Term 0-2 yrs |
Medium Term 2-5 yrs |
Long Term 5+ yrs |
|
|
Quantify and understand contributions of tourism
to local economy |
v |
|
|
|
|
Establish a “tourist route” through City that
relates to established districts and neighborhoods, important public
buildings, and the waterfront/bay |
v |
|
|
|
|
Maintain and reinforce the tourist hub in Downtown
and Pier/ waterfront that has specialty stores and lodging facilities
catering to tourists |
|
|
v |
|
|
Reuse vacant publicly owned buildings to support
surrounding uses |
|
v |
|
|
|
Consider preparation of development guidelines
that require new development to respond to constraints imposed by topography
and views; define important view corridors |
|
v |
|
|
|
Identify important watershed areas, natural
drainageways and gullies and restrict the nature of development in those
areas. Promote these areas as parks
and trails |
|
v |
|
|
|
Ensure that new developments appropriately balance
hardscape with natural landscaping and adopt measures to reduce off-site
runoff as much as possible |
|
|
v |
|
Growth |
|
Short Term 0-2 yrs |
Medium Term 2-5 yrs |
Long Term 5+ yrs |
|
|
Prepare a specific land use plan for
extraterritorial jurisdiction and coordinate strategies with County |
v |
|
|
|
|
Develop an annexation plan and policies including
zoning |
|
v |
|
|
|
Determine areas of varying levels of improvement
priorities to support new development |
v |
|
|
|
|
Identify high priority development areas and
encourage new development to locate in those areas through capital
improvements program and location of infrastructure |
v |
|
|
|
|
Establish phased growth areas to target future
development |
|
v |
|
|
|
Discourage public investment (buildings,
infrastructure, services) beyond or outside of planned growth areas |
|
v |
|
|
|
Collaborate with existing property owners within
extraterritorial jurisdiction to encourage new development opportunities |
|